RENAISSANCE NOVEMBER 2022

Ḥ ad ī th Studies 42 Monthly Renaissance November 2022 Mu ḥ ammad ‘Awf ibn M ā lik al-Ashja‘ ī Mu ḥ ammad ibn Ka‘b al-Qurz ī M ū s ā ibn ‘Ubaydah Bakk ā r ibn Zayd ibn Ḥ ab ī b Sulaym ā n Ibr ā h ī m ibn ‘Abd al-‘Az ī z ‘Abdull ā h ibn Bil ā l Ṭ ahm ā n ibn Mu ḥ ammad Ibn Ab ī Shaybah Surayj ibn ‘Abdull ā h ibn Ḥ af ṣ ibn Ibr ā h ī m ibn Y ū nus Mu ḥ ammad ‘Abdull ā h Hamzah al-Fahn ī Mu ḥ ammad Mihr ā n Mu ṣā b ibn ibn al-Fa ḍ l A ḥ mad ibn Raw ḥ ibn Ibr ā h ī m ibn Ibn Ḥ umayd Rishdayn al-Fara ḥ Ḥ amzah A ḥ mad ibn ‘ Ī s ā al- Ṭ abar ī al-Tabar ā n ī A ḥ mad ibn Ḥ af ṣ Mu ḥ ammad ibn Ja‘far Ab ū Bakr A ḥ mad ibn Ab ā n Ab ū Nu‘aym Ab ū al- Ḥ asan al-Bazz ā r al-Kha ṭī b al-Bayhaq ī al-Baghd ā d ī This narrative cannot be reliably traced back to the Prophet (sws). Following is the jar ḥ recorded by al-Mizz ī about M ū s ā ibn ‘Ubaydah (d. 152 AH): according to A ḥ mad ibn Ḥ anbal, he is munkar al- ḥ ad ī th and that his narratives have not the slightest weight before him; Ya ḥ y ā ibn Ma‘ ī n says l ā yu ḥ tajju bi ḥ ad ī thih ī , ḍ a‘ ī f and laysa bi shay’ ; ‘Al ī ibn Mad ī n ī regards him to be ḍ a‘ ī f al- ḥ ad ī th ; Ab ū Zur‘ah says that he is laysa bi qaw ī al- ḥ ad ī th ; Ab ū Ḥā tim regards him to be munkar al- ḥ ad ī th ; al-Tirmidh ī and al- Nas ā ’ ī also regard him to be ḍ a‘ ī f ; at another instance the latter says that he is laysa bi thiqah ; Ibn Sa‘d says that he is thiqah kath ī r al- ḥ ad ī th wa laysa bi ḥ ujjah ; Ya ‘q ū b ibn Shaybag says that he is ḍ a‘ ī f al- ḥ ad ī th jidda ṇ and among whose narratives should not be adduced from because of his weakness and weak memory; Ibn ‘Ad ī says that